Enrico Weigelt wrote: > BTW: could be introduce an separate (optional) masking method > for such proprietary stuff ? > > I personally don't want to have such stuff on my system, but I'm > really too lazy for check each package I intend to install by > its own. > > Would also be cool to have database for those things which is > easy to query.
I suppose what you want is true enforcement of ACCEPT_LICENSE, in which you specify acceptable licenses. Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
