Chris White wrote: > On Friday 01 September 2006 12:46, Jakub Moc wrote: >> WTH is debburn??? Geeez, make the folk respect GPL like everyone else, I >> don't want any debburn. Besides, we don't distribute any binaries (if we >> do on release media, we'll have to stop until JS regains a bit of mental >> sanity). > > What are talking about? Debburn is the debian fork suggested in the original > post. The whole point of it IS to make it respect the GPL.
Wonderful. Make upstream respect it, instead of forking. > Also if you stop > and look at the URL, it's an svn repository with the SOURCE for it. Most > people don't svn repository binaries. You've probably misunderstood me, I was referring to the "oh, we need to get rid of cdrtools ASAP" call, not to the link you've posted. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
