On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:02PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: > Brian Harring wrote: [Mon Sep 04 2006, 01:04:21AM CDT] > > > 49 (alt package manager 1) --> R (by council; sane API preferred) > > > 50 (alt package manager 2) --> R (by council; sane API preferred) > > > > Might want to clarify the "sane API preferred" bit. > > Sorry, I should have been more precise. The council rejected both > GLEPs in favor of starting with a Gentoo package manager API (which > spb is slowly assembling), and then requiring in-tree package > managers to implement that API. Or at least that was my understanding > of that meeting.
Clarifying a bit, he was to document EAPI=0; that's not a package manager API however, just a format description. ;) ~harring
pgpWqZirpEpoS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
