Alec Warner wrote:
> Stuart Herbert wrote:
>> On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last time I
>>> asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :)
>>
>> The package was masked without Christel (on behalf of QA) posting an
>> advance warning of their actions. That's not trying to work together.
>> It's not trying to work with existing teams.
>
> So file a complaint; once again the -dev list shouldn't be for
> complaining about how people {suck,don't follow policy}Why are you so "file a complaint" happy lately? Isn't it the general idea (and maybe even documented on our site) that people are supposed to work out the issues before you go to the complaint phase? I really don't like the idea of us opting for filing a compliant rather than work with the person individually first. > You can always revert the mask also; most developers have cvs commit > access (I know you do). -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
