Hi,

I'm one of the people working on seeds.
It's not a new project afaic i produce seed-alike things anyway because I need to run a large serverpark on gentoo and I can't hand-install servers anymore. We generate custom stage4's tailored to our environment.

One of the reasons i was/am interested in working on seeds is to learn more about the "official" tools like genkernel and catalyst. And a side goal is to get them better documented while learning how to use them.

Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 15:07 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
Why hasn't anybody even *tried* to contact Release Engineering on
something like this, considering we already have all of the tools
necessary to complete this, as well as the expertise?
We have, and folks there have been very helpful.

Really?  Who?

You haven't spoken to anyone that I've asked in #gentoo-releng.  You
haven't spoken to anyone on the genkernel or catalyst development teams.
Who exactly is it that you're talking to about this?

I've sent mail to plasmaroo/Tim wrt catalyst and genkernel and how to get started. Mainly because he gave a interesting demonstration of both at Gentoo UK 2006 conference. He seemed like the right guy to contact.
He was kind enough to provide starting instructions.

Anyway, I'm not saying I dislike the idea.

Great, I feel it would fill a gap for folks like me, who are in need of a repeatable process of generating stage4's or seeds. I also hope that the stages/seeds I cook up might be of use to others and at the same time hope to improve my own by cooperating with others on generating them. They way I'm generating them now could definitly use some improvement.

I'm just sick of new
"projects" spawning off without being thought out in the least, and
making us all look like jackasses.  Is it honestly going to be the new
"tradition" that every single new project that starts out is going to be
completely undiscussed, poorly thought-out, poorly implemented, and
cause us all to look like a bunch of fools for weeks on end before it
*finally* gets into a half-way workable state?  What ever happened to
*talking* about something before going off and announcing it to the
world as if it's some kind of completed project and ready for public
consumption?  Why is it necessary to even...

I've seen an announcement to -dev which is hardly the world but a place where new developments are discussed ?

Apart from that:
I fail to understand the fierceness of your reaction. I was (and still am) looking forward to cooperating as much as possible with releng on this since releng is indeed a place where much knowledge on the technology we plan to use is centered.

I looked at the dev-manual which states the following on projects:

* A project exists if it has a web page at www.gentoo.org/proj/en/<project name> that is maintained. ("Maintained" means that the information on the page is factually correct and not out-of-date.) If the webpage isn't maintained, it is presumed dead.

* It may have one or many leads, and the leads are selected by the members of the project. This selection must occur at least once every 12 months and may occur at any time.

* It may have zero or more sub-projects. Sub-projects are just projects that provide some additional structure, and their web pages are in the project's space.

* Not everything (or everyone) needs a project.

* Projects need not be long-term.

* Projects may well conflict with other projects. That's okay.

* Any dev may create a new project just by creating a new page (or, more realistically, directory and page) in gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en.

The text seems to encourage people to start projects if they want work together on common goals. It does not require new projects to provide a well thought-out roadmap with stated approval of relevant other projects. Neither does it require projects to be discussed on -dev before inception.

If you feel in anyway mistreated or offended by the fact that this project was started I would like to know why, and if possible remedy the situation.

FWIW: I've been looking at catalyst and genkernel the last two days and am trying to get both properly setup in the limited spare-time I have after work. They both look like awesome tools for what I want to do.

I hope that your view on the matter does not reflect the view of the entire -releng team. I would like to work together as much as possible, however the first reaction is not exactly favorable.

I apologise to everyone for my responses to this.  I'm done.

Thank you.
I hope that with that any resentment is out of the air, if not feel free to grab me in IRC:Innocenti. I currently hang out on #gentoo-php, I'll try and make a habit of logging into #gentoo-releng more often from now on.

Best Regards,

Ramon



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to