-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Ross wrote:
> Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> 
>> Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official
>> Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org
>> namespace...
> 
> Really?
> 
> http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060424-newsletter.xml
> 
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/devguide.xml#doc_chap3
> 
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/draft/complete/handbook.xml?part=1&chap=6#doc_chap2
> (Yes, it's only a draft, but it still meets your criteria)
> 
> Mind you, I'm not saying that I agree with linking to Gentoo-wiki - I
> just think it's important to point out that your statement is incorrect.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andrew
> 
That draft is invalid -- it was an old project by SwifT; he was doing a trial
rewrite of the entire handbook quite some time ago just to make it more generic,
less Gentoo-centric.

So it's no good; mentioning that draft is a red herring.

And /proj/en/ is up to the individual projects; /proj/ docs have nothing to do
with /doc/, which is where the primary official Gentoo documents reside.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFIyHsrsJQqN81j74RAvFjAKC7hHHlSTV4r97NvWXhhksweIhAxwCeO0iP
locLB5Gg2fhYlGQGvIWXuAs=
=2Thv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to