On Sunday 22 October 2006 16:17, David Shakaryan wrote: > Hypothetically speaking, if version 1.4 of a package is in package.mask > and we are now at version 1.6, with 1.4 removed from the tree, is there > really a reason why the mask for 1.4 should stay?
no, punt it ... if people want such a pointless mask, they can add a comment about it -mike
pgpHRKE1ucz5q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
