On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 19:15 -0800, David Shakaryan wrote: > The desktop-wm herd is understaffed and has a bunch of dead packages > lying around which no one wants to maintain. I tried to give a valid > alternative for all of the packages I want removed. At first glance, it > seems like all of the following packages also have a dead upstream. > > x11-wm/aewm++ -- alternative: pekwm > x11-wm/aewm++-goodies -- see above > x11-wm/amiwm -- no release since 1998-03-15 > x11-wm/larswm -- alternative: pekwm > x11-wm/lwm -- alternative: pekwm > x11-wm/pwm -- bug #149593, alternative: ion > x11-wm/wmi -- superceded by wmii > > Please see bug #153388 for further information along with a list of > other bugs requesting removal of desktop-wm packages. Discussion can > occur here, but all objections should also be posted on the bug itself. > > Flame now or forever hold your peace. ;) >
Pwm is a different wm than ion but they are both provided on the same tarball so why remove pwm ? Are you trying to add a USE for ion to provide pwm ? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
