On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:56:47 -0600 "James Potts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This looks good on the surface, Chris, but what happens in the case > where somebody wants to use the Release tree, but also wants (or > needs) one or more packages from the Live tree, and doesn't want to > switch completely over to the live tree? If I understand what you > want to do correctly, the Release tree would include only stable > packages. Other packages wouldn't just be masked, they would be > completely unavailable to anybody using that tree. > > I like the idea of having a stable p.mask much better, which says > "profile" to me. Any thoughts on a special profile just for releases? Sounds like a perfect situation to use a package manager with true multiple repository support. -Steve
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
