> As others have said, look at using udev to name your network devices in > a persistant manner, it's the best solution.
Yes, i agree. But i have thought about it, and i wonder, if it's going to work if: 1. udev loads the modules which results in a "natural order": saying eth0 and eth1 are used. 2. my udev-rules say, that the network-card which has the "natural name" eth1 has to be called eth0 Will udev rename the card eth1 to eth0 and the card eth0 to eth1? Maybe udev also loads the modules in a way, so that the cards don't get any "natural name" by the kernel and instead, the udev-daemon has the full power to assign the names.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
