On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:06:32 -0500 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yuri Vasilevski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100 > > "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU > >> General Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be > >> sure it's alright to license it to "any later version". Linux > >> kernel for instance is licensed _only_ under GPLv2, but not any > >> later version. > > > > I don't think this is a good solution, as in any case the package is > > licensed under GPL-2, so how about for the packages that only > > support GPL-2 we set: > > > > LICENSE="GPL-2" > > > > While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a > > special case of multiple licensing) we do: > > > > LICENSE="GPL-2 GPL-3" > > If you meant: > > LICENSE=" || ( GPL-2 GPL-3 )" > > then I agree ;) > > It would be under Either the GPL-2 OR a later version, not both, yes? Right, thanks for catching that. Yuri. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
