On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 21:22 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > I wonder if with ACCEPT_LICENSES it would be possible to get a way to > represent this issue, like a "unredistributable" fake license, disabled > during GRP building for instance, so that the packages needing that license > wouldn't be built in binary form and redistributed by us.
Nope. > Any proposal on this issue? USE=bindist If that is set, then we don't link to libmp4v2, no matter what else USE says. This is how we generally get around issues such as this. It isn't necessarily optimal, but it is the current best solution that we have and it'll match up with our other packages. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
