-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone,
Bug #161045 [1] requests that portage support RESTRICT=sandbox. This is certainly a valid request but a user may wish to reject a package based on certain questionable values of RESTRICT. Examples other than sandbox incude unattended [2] and userpriv [3]. I suggest that we add support for a new incremental variable called ACCEPT_RESTRICT so that a user can accept or reject restrictions. Much like package.keywords, we can also have a package.restrict file located in /etc/portage for per-package settings. Thoughts? [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161045 [2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0052.html [3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159876 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFpBot/ejvha5XGaMRApz/AJ9EMGSFKUwnZwzYo1TbimLT19hSWQCgqdRD 1cnMmOvVr3/bejMrR6Og+nY= =G2JM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
