On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 01:15 +0100, Robert Buchholz wrote: > If no one objects, I'd like to implement these changes. But there are > some questions still open: > * Who will add the entries to base/make.defaults? Can I do this?
Not only *can* you, but you absolutely *must* do this if you're making the changes. The profiles aren't some black box that nobody can touch. The only thing anyone asks is that you know the ramifications of your actions. Asking here and getting sound advice should suffice for determining whether something is worth doing and the proper solution. *Not* adding these yourself means pawning work off on someone else, and possibly breaking (at least) your packages, and a violation of policy (the "don't break the tree" one). > * Should the defaults and the USE_EXPAND entry be in base/ even though > both programs do not are not keyworded for all arches? Yes. After all, they *may* be keyworded on any arch. It isn't like the hardware/software *can't* run on those arches. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
