On Wednesday 10 January 2007 19:03, Jakub Moc wrote: > Mike Frysinger napsal(a): > > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 09:34, Jakub Moc wrote: > >> Huh? I was referring to this link [1] on Bug 161045 (which presumably > >> started this whole debate) > > > > so you're replying to a non-gentoo-dev thread on a gentoo-dev thread when > > the threads arent even closely related ? how does that make sense ? > > > > this thread has nothing to do with commercial packages > > No, it does not. And RESTRICT=sandbox is still completely unneeded, > commercial packages or not... We don't need to introduce a special > RESTRICT because of two borked packages in the tree and we should not > introduce any more packages borked in a similar way into the tree.
I agree. The restrict should only be even considered when it is clear that the sandbox is indeed flawed by concept and cannot be fixed. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgpWhO94WyagX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
