On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:06:31 -0800 "Robin H. Johnson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 08:38:34AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > | The other points were valid, but if it works anything like
| > | Gentoo, I think this is BS. Sure, everyone commits to the same
| > | tree, but not to the same lines of the same file. Unless all they
| > | do over in BSD-land is global seds all day long, I don't see this
| > | scenario.
| > You mean like when eight or so archs keyword something for a
| > security bug within a few hours of each other? Or when three or
| > four archs go stable with a new KDE or Gnome release on the same
| > day?
|
| You get conflicts with CVS already in that case, it's not going to
| increase the number of conflicts in any way.

Except that with CVS, you just update that one directory, which isn't
particularly painful even for all the arch people who live in backwards
countries with wet string internet connections.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail                                : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web                                 : http://ciaranm.org/
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to