Mike Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:03:49 +0100
> Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, 27. January. 2007 13:22:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> Raúl Porcel wrote:
>>>> # Raúl Porcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27 Jan 2007)
>>>> # Masked for removal 26 Feb 2007, bug 135257, security issues
>>>> # Replaced by www-client/seamonkey[-bin]
>>>> www-client/mozilla
>>>> www-client/mozilla-bin
>>> How about not breaking the tree?
>>>
>>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "www-client/mozilla" have been
>>> masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to
>>> complete your request:
>>> - www-client/mozilla-1.7.13 (masked by: package.mask)
>> What about the rest of the portage error ? At least it could be used,
>> to fix (well sort of) it :)
>
> I think he just has www-client/mozilla in his world file. From what
> I see, nothing in tree still depends on www-client/mozilla{,-bin}.
> There's just a block against it by www-client/seamonkey.
> No. I used reverse dependencies scanning tools to find that and posted that as a mail. The issue was since resolved because I pointed it out. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
