Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jan 29 2007, 09:50:28AM CST] > > Then it should be offered to the 8th person, at which point either > > he/she will then refuse the nomination and it's offered to the 9th. > > Rinse and repeat. > > If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election. > > > > Agreed. #3 > > >From my POV having a new election potentially over and over is a waste > of time and resources.
My only qualm with this approach is whether or not we then risk promoting a candidate who was resoundingly defeated during the actual election to a Council position because only a handful of people ran for the position. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgphDsgw6xilV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
