Bryan Østergaard ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:00:12PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
Bryan Østergaard ha scritto:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
<Snipped silly inflamatory bit>
Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker
archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder.
Clearly, something needs to be done about this.
It's even more perceived that there are a couple of satellite people who are working very strongly and sometimes (sadly) successfully to create an un-healty environment for developers and users. Personally I would mention you Caranm, beu and geoman.
Please stop the personal attacks. They serve absolutely no purpose other
than poisoning the developer community further.

Regards,
Bryan Østergaard
mkay, but sometimes is _really_ difficult, missing flameeyes and keep geoman does not make it easyer.
Might be dificult but maybe you could explain how it helps to bash
geoman? A good advice before sending any mail like that is to take at
least 10 minutes break to cool off and then read it again before sending it.

Regards,
Bryan Østergaard

Bashing Stephen Becker for comments like the one you can found at "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163795#c6"; may survive also the 10 minutes break, even a night of sleep, and bashing is not enough.

FYI the offence has been reiterated in #c12 still from geoman, and enforced by ciaranm in c#16, same bug, same attitude.

Regards,
Francesco Riosa
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to