On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:56 +0000, Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:20:48 -0500 > Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is now, > > I have no idea. > > A QA subproject which has not yet released a public draft.
Now, yes. > > We asked for a specification. If the PMS > > team is unable or unwilling to provide us with what we asked under > > the terms we asked for it > > We're working to provide it. So far, I haven't been asked for it under > any particular terms other than "at some point in the future, and we > realise that it will take a while to finish". Yes. What we want to discuss is a possible timeline for completion, and what resources you may need to get it done within the agreed timeline. Notice that I used timeline, instead of deadline. It was done on purpose really just to shut people the hell up. We're not out to get anybody, we're just wanting to make sure we're all on track and moving forward. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
