On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:30:36 +0100 Jakob Buchgraber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You're avoiding my point. The improvements that are being made > >> are, by and large, insignificant. Portage doesn't need a few > >> little tweaks now and again. It has to start delivering a whole > >> load of major new features (there's no one killer feature), and > >> quickly. > > Why don't you join the portage team and try to persuade the current > portage devs and help to implement the "killer features"? > So instead of saying that portage is missing features and developing > your own pm you could be even more productive and help improving > portage. Why don't ya do that?
Because Portage is beyond repair. The code and design are so bad that it's easier to start from scratch. Which, funnily enough, is what I ended up doing. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
