Steve Dibb wrote: > Michael Krelin wrote: >>> If you're feeling ambitious, it might be more appropriate to change that >>> use flag to ``ps: Add support for postscript'' so that it describes the >>> functionality rather than the package providing that functionality. >> >> Isn't less ambiguous 'postscript' even better? > > I was thinking the same thing. Why don't we just change the use flag as > well? > > Steve
I like 'postscript' because it's much more descriptive. 'ps' is vague as is 'gs'. -- Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
