Steve Dibb wrote:
> Michael Krelin wrote:
>>> If you're feeling ambitious, it might be more appropriate to change that
>>> use flag to ``ps: Add support for postscript'' so that it describes the
>>> functionality rather than the package providing that functionality.
>>
>> Isn't less ambiguous 'postscript' even better?
> 
> I was thinking the same thing.  Why don't we just change the use flag as
> well?
> 
> Steve

I like 'postscript' because it's much more descriptive. 'ps' is vague as
is 'gs'.


-- 
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to