On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:21:46 +0200 Alin Năstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > In which case it must be a feature, so why not use the keyword > > FEATURE? > > Why would we need a keyword for that? We already have "enhancement" > as a possible value of the severity field. I think he was making a joke there (along the lines of the saying, "It's not a bug, it's a feature!"). Sadly, this just goes to show how people need to be more careful in their wording in a community like ours with people coming from so many different cultures. Or maybe people need to lighten up a bit more, I don't really know which. Anyone have any further suggestions how we as a community can avoid this sorta confusion from in-jokes, idioms, etc? It seems to be happening very often now-a-days (or maybe I'm just paying more attention than I used to). -- Mike Kelly -- [email protected] mailing list
