On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 05 Apr > 2007 09:28:17 +0100: > > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 01:51:56 -0400 > > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> - PMS: > >> - status update from spb > >> - moving it to Gentoo svn > >> - schedule for getting remaining issues settled > > > > Same question as last time this came up: > > > > Can you name any other projects where the Council has become > > involved in scheduling issues? > > If I may... take this as at least certain members of the council > agreeing with you that certain package management issues are holding > up Gentoo (note, I did NOT say portage, per se, but package > management issues in general, I'm deliberately leaving it at that > general level). <snip> > Or are you now arguing that movement on package management is /not/ > holding back Gentoo, now? I want a consistent answer, and to know why the Council considers PMS to be more important time-wise than, as far as I can see, any other project ever. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
