On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:17 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: > > On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > >> Then we require this file to be updated > >> monthly. What do you think? > > > > I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time. This has > > been brought up before, but some projects just don't have enough going > > on to update on a regular cycle. > > > > So you just change the date? I don't think we should require anything > but acknowledgment that the old data still applies.
So turn it into one more mundane and pointless task that I am forced to perform simply because it is a matter of policy? Having to go around saying "yes, this is still correct" is rather wasteful, is it not? I know I would have to do this for several projects, all of which are not the sort to really have updates to publish. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
