On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:11:07 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Except there are. Hence why we want EAPI 1 in the short term, not > > several years from now. The stuff that will take longer can go into > > a later EAPI. > > this is really up to the portage team to drive
If they instead decide that EAPI 1 is a long term goal, will the Council intervene? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
