Ned Ludd wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 14:56 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > >> I would like to take this time to note and re-affirm the proper bug >> assignment policy and have it noted somewhere officially in Gentoo Policy. >> >> Bugs that are created for the purpose of getting arches to keyword or >> stabilize a particular package should initially be assigned to the >> herd/maintainer of said package with all requested arches being CCed. >> Once all but the last arch has keyworded said package, it is acceptable >> and proper for a bug wrangler and/or maintainer/herd to re-assign the >> bug to the last remaining arch and they remove that arch from CC. They >> should add their herd/maintainer to the CC of the bug. >> >> Once the last remaining arch has completed the bug, it is up to them to >> close it. They know it's up to them to close it since the bug is >> assigned directly to them. >> >> This helps keep bugzilla tidy and makes it easy to identify >> stabilization/keywording requests which are a priority for that arch to >> take care of. >> > > > This is in direct conflict with the security bug policy handling which > end up putting the maintainer on the CC: along with the arches. > > Also please don't cross post. > > -solar > > > Then can we officially say this is at the discretion of the maintainer of said package then?
I'd just like this to be official noted as who can make this decision and who can not and what is the recommended handling. To avoid conflicts in the future. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
