On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:33:50AM +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: > > Both 'assign' and 'cc' (and derivations thereof are not suitable). > notification=assignment|cc|none ? This is to answer expose's question as well, but the attribute should only indicate if the maintainer entry should be used for any automatic process at all, not how to use it.
One of the reasons is that multiple maintainers each with
notification=assignment obviously won't work, and it's non-trivial to
validate via the DTD (yes, DTDs suck compared to XSchema, I know).
I intend that the first non-excluded maintainer entry is the one used
for the automatic process.
In terms of implementing this in the DTD, I'm going to specify that
'contact=1' (or whatever name we settle on) is the default, so that we
don't break validation of any existing metadata:
<!ATTLIST maintainer
contact (0|1) 1 -- should this maintainer be used by
-- automatic processes?
>
In light of the above, how about 'automatic=0'?
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
pgpcmSEkc0ZuK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
