On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:10:39 -0500 »Q« <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In <news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I bet there are other users around, who think a config file format > > change that doesnt break anything but produce warnings in the first > > place is non-critical. > > I'm another one. I guess someone needs to decide whether the > criterion is 'critical' or 'important'; there seems to be confusion > about the intent and wording of GLEP 42.
Are you a Paludis user who thinks that and who knows what news item delivery looks like? If you aren't, you won't see the news item. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
