On Sunday 06 May 2007 2:42:23 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2007 14:39:13 -0400 > > Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, its designed to save messages for users to read. It was > > implemented because important information scrolled off the screen in > > major updates. If a user chooses not to read warn level messages > > from elog then they are responsible for the breakage, why abuse news > > for it? > > One of the reasons GLEP 42 was necessary was because users *don't* read > things delivered by other methods.
And they are magically going to read the news? I doubt it if it continues to be as trivial as the first suggested item. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
