On Sunday 06 May 2007 4:22:44 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:13:56 -0400 > > Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So you want users to have to explicitly acknowledge all ewarn > > > notices? Now *that*'s a way of making the system useless by > > > overusing it. > > > > Err, warn notices are supposed to be important warnings. If they are > > not it sounds like a good job for QA. > > That's a completely different degree of importance.
Sounds like its the right degree of importants for deprecated things upstream to me. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
