Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Thilo Bangert wrote: > > All packages with <herd>maintainer-needed</herd> will be moved to > > <herd>no-herd</herd>. > > maintainer-needed is different from no-herd. no-herd is valid when a > dev is maintaining a pkg outside of a herd. no-herd is not valid for > when the package is entirely unmaintained, maintainer-needed would be a > better tag for it. I would not make that change.
if that were so, we would need to document it. from my reading of the current policies[1,2,3] <herd> is required and either no-herd or in herds.xml, no-herd only being allowed if no herd fits. > > I tried to fix up your list and thanks > found a handful of the packages not > even in existence in the tree. Can you re-run this with a fully up to > date tree? funny - so why would cvs up not be enough? which packages? i was able to find all packages on packages.gentoo.org thanks [1]http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/metadata/index.html [2]http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/metastructure/herds/index.xml [3]http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=4
pgpGNreQAXTcz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
