On Saturday 12 May 2007, Matti Bickel wrote: > recently, there's been some worries about the changes and new > requirements the ion upstream, tuomov, put forth in a new LICENSE for > ion-3. It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which > requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the > previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause, > which prohibits distributions from carrying a "significantly modified" > ion-3 release under the ion name.
i'd just rename the package to whatever Debian uses or punt it completely with a masking reason: # upstream is braindead, ask them to get a transplant -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
