-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > I have seen many Perl virtuals go straight to stable and haven't ever > experienced any adverse effects. :)
well, that's the idea :) But like I think it was Graham said in another subthread of this, perl team's virtuals only go to stable if both (in our case, there are usually only 2 possible sources for fulfillment) deps are already stable, so really all you're doing is updating a pointer reference. um. can i be more confusing? let's find out! > >> /me hopes some arch brains step in, like weeve in particular, who is >> usually far more eloquent at defending an arch's position > > Oh sorry. :) bah - that was me failing to finish the sentence that in my head concluded as "than me." That and softserve machines aside, weeve and gustovoz are pretty (in a positive sense) vocal about arch related items, so they were the ones that came to mind when i threw in the comment about arch's commenting. Double bah. I think i've dug a good hole here. Let me get in it. - -- - -----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E - -----o()o---------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGXvLHq1ztTp5/Ti4RAtf/AKCLWpCWcsD+m8njHSdfWltt+owQ1gCfaV2P S4o2MhHNJFs2gv2oN6yms/A= =sj0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
