Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
>>> Marius Mauch wrote:
>>>> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an
>> honest question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have
>> serious doubts about it. It's of no use if people have to be told to
>> move threads from -dev to that new list.
>>>>   
>>> We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose.
>>> While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that
>>> people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-politics or
>> else.."
>>> for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failing to use logic in your
>>> technical discussion or else..." with power to temporarily ban people
>>> for non-compliance could be a useful thing.
>>>> Marius
>>>>
>>>>   
>> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
>> can't have that, no sir.
> I'll presume this to be irony. Oh. Sorry, can't have that on this list
> today.
> Please ban yourself for 24hours.

Not irony, sarcasm, and no sir, I will not ban myself.  The proctors
could have though, but not since no one will listen to them and they
have been completely undermined and made obsolete by an overzealous
council member.
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to