On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 10:15:35PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:52:39 +0200 > Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:21 +0200 > > > Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > An ebuild's PROVIDE list. > > > > > > Nnnnope. Not legal. > > > > The question was "Is there any place in the tree where a dep atom and > > a CPV are both accepted?" Look at the last word. > > If it's not legal, it doesn't matter whether or not it's accepted by > fluke.
If the question is whether it's accepted, what matters is whether it's accepted. If you're interested in legality, ask whether it should be accepted, not whether it is. spb did that in the same message, and I responded negatively to that. I'm really not seeing your point here. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
