Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages

[Petteri Räty]

Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
> On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> mayhaps we need a new function to be run in src_install() to label
>>> files as "sensitive" ... so baselayout would do:
>>> esosensitive /etc/{fstab,group,passwd,shadow}
>>> and then we expand the format of CONTENTS in the vdb:
>>> priv /etc/fstab <hash> <mtime>
>> And what would be phase 2 of that? Just having a new filetype
>> in CONTENTS doesn't accomplish anything by itself ...
> 
> updating any tool that creates binary packages from the live $ROOT of course 
> silly billy
> 
> current behavior:
> # quickpkg baselayout
>  * Building package for sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4
>  * Packages now in '/usr/portage/pacakges':
>  * sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4: 307K
> 
> proposed new behavior (exact output here is not part of the discussion so 
> dont 
> nit pick it):
> # quickpkg baselayout
>  * Building package for sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4
>  *  Skipping sensitive file: /etc/passwd
>  *  Skipping sensitive file: /etc/shadow
>  *  Skipping sensitive file: /etc/group
>  * Packages now in '/usr/portage/pacakges':
>  * sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4: 307K
> # quickpkg --iamsensitive baselayout
>  * Building package for sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4
>  *  Including sensitive file: /etc/passwd
>  *  Including sensitive file: /etc/shadow
>  *  Including sensitive file: /etc/group
>  * Packages now in '/usr/portage/pacakges':
>  * sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.10-r4: 307K
> -mike

It would probably be prudent to have pristine versions of the files
installed on the system (optional) so that you can actually create
binary packages with all the files.

Regards,
Petteri

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature