On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The specific underlying question being, what are the use cases > > > > > for binary packages? > > > > > > > > the use of the binpkg is not an issue, it's the creation ... > > > > people blindly creating tbz2's which could contain their > > > > sensitive files and posting them > > > > > > Use cases include all aspects of use, including creation. > > > > extended analysis on the use cases is irrelevant in the scope of this > > thread > > No it isn't. You're talking about making a change, but you haven't > established that you're changing the right thing or that the scope of > your change is optimal. There's a good chance in this case that the > problem you're attempting to solve is better solved by a change in a > slightly different area.
feel free to ponder whatever you like, the issue lies purely in the creation of the tarball which is what i will address in quickpkg -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
