On Saturday 21 July 2007, Roy Marples wrote: > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 21:28 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > > Is there a common bug to report snags to? I've hit one: > > > /etc/init.d/net.eth0 used to be a symlink to net.lo. After > > > installing, it was gone (I figure it went with baselayout-1). > > > Luckily, I have direct console access, otherwise the machine > > > would have been gone after the reboot. Definitely something to > > > yell about during merging. > > > > We don't ship with net.eth0 because there is no guarantee an interface > > called eth0 exists. net.lo (net.lo0 in *BSDs) always exists so we just > > ship that. > > One very good idea would be to get udev to create any net links that do > not exist to net.lo > > Then we truly have plug and play :)
indeed, that'd be sleeky and sexy ... go file a bug ;) -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
