On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:46:05 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > The only specification-compliant yaml parser is written in C, has > > only the bottom two layers of the stack and no usable external > > bindings... Perhaps you mean "something that's basically yaml except > > with reserved string-start characters not handled correctly", in > > which case there's Syck... > > what about libyaml?
libyaml's the compliant one, but it only supports the bottom part of the stack. You'd still have to write the composer and constructor by hand, which is a lot of work. It also can't read many documents generated by Syck because it's strictly specification compliant and rejects invalid input. Yaml looks nicer than XML on the surface, but unfortunately it's still a pain in the ass to handle... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
