On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:12:52 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias Schwarzott kirjoitti: > > On Freitag, 31. August 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > >> Hi there! > >> > >> What do you think about adding /etc/udev/rules.d/ to > >> CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. This will no longer bother the user with > >> updating these files. Thus it will reduce the number of bugs > >> triggered by forgotten config-file updates. > >> > >> If user needs home-brewn rules he is requested to add own files, > >> and not use the already existing ones. > >> > > > > Only problem I see: What to do with people having custom > > modifications inside the default rules-files? > > > > Matthias > > > > > > Can they add /etc/udev/rules.d back to CONFIG_PROTECT in make.conf? No, that wouldn't work. However they could add '-/etc/udev/rules.d' to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK or add individual files to CONFIG_PROTECT. Marius -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
