Ulrich Mueller kirjoitti:
> Hi,
> 
> we have now three implementations of locate in the tree that block
> each other: sys-apps/{m,r,s}locate
> 
> This looks like the classical case for a virtual/locate. Any opinions?
> 
> I came across the issue when committing the new package app-emacs/fff
> (which is the Emacs equivalent of app-vim/locateopen) to the Emacs
> overlay; it will be moved to the tree soon.
> 
> Ulrich

Is there something/how many that will need to depend on that? I think
locate is not part of the system set either so no virtual is needed for
that either.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to