Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 13:15 Wed 26 Sep , Mart Raudsepp (leio) wrote:
>> mv "${D}"/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py \
>> "${D}"/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py-2.0
>> mv "${D}"/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.pth \
>> "${D}"/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.pth-2.0
>> }
>>
>> pkg_postinst() {
>> python_version
>> python_mod_optimize /usr/lib/python${PYVER}/site-packages/gtk-2.0
>> alternatives_auto_makesym
>> /usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py
>> pygtk.py-[0-9].[0-9] alternatives_auto_makesym
>> /usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.pth
>> pygtk.pth-[0-9].[0-9] python_mod_compile
>> ${ROOT}usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py
>
> This is pretty weird, because it uses get_libdir() almost everywhere but
> skips it once. Wonder if we could add a repoman check that looks for
> whether an ebuild calls get_libdir(), then checks for any instances of
> '[^[:alnum:]]lib[^[:alnum:]]'.
>
It seems a bit inefficient to keep calling the function in an implicit
subshell. What's wrong with ldir="/usr/$(get_libdir)/" [or "${ROOT}usr.."]
once and then reusing the value?
(The single use of $ROOT in pkg_postinst() seems odd too, to this newb.)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
