On 09:37 Wed 03 Oct , Zac Medico wrote: > Trying to include things that aren't implemented or things that are > controversial will delay it. It's difficult to make time estimates > for anything that's not implemented yet. > > It's trivial to do the EAPI-1 bump if we only include things that > are already implemented. I can have a sys-apps/portage release in > the tree this week with EAPI-1 support if we choose to do that. > Looking at bug #174380, I'd say that EAPI-1 should certainly include > #174405, #174410, and #179380 since they're all implemented and > relatively non-controversial. Anything more than those can lead to > potential delays.
Alright, do it! =) "Release early, release often" applies to EAPI too. Thanks, Donnie -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
