On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 14:57 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote: > On Fri, 2007-05-10 at 11:46 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > How many packages depend on virtual/editor? Should it be a virtual at > > all? > > <Tester_> !rdep virtual/editor > <jeeves> virtual/editor <- app-admin/sudo sys-process/fcron > > I think the answer is none that really should, I would favor just > removing virtual/editor.
Ehh... "system" also requires it. Removing the virtual means everybody, no matter what, will get nano and won't be able to remove it without portage bitching up a storm. Currently, you can replace nano with any editor that meets the virtual and it'll satisfy the system target. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part