-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:40:40 +0100
> "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Another prime example for use flags with more than two values:
>>
>> mod=off
>> mod=fmod
>> mod=libmodplug
>>
>> the first for disabling mod support, the second for enabling it and
>> preferring fmod implementation, the third for enabling it and
>> preferring libmodplug implementation.
> 
> I don't think you've actually argued the case why one USE flag with
> three, perhaps four modes (off, fmod, libmodplug, and perhaps default)
> is preferable to two USE flags with two modes each (fmod and modplug,
> both refering to the libs a package links to, either on or off).

I tried to explain this before. See
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/52316/match=use+options>.

Having an ordinary use flag for each library may work well enough when there
are less than three libraries that provide a certain functionality, although
with 2 old-style use flags you already have one bogus fourth option. Default
should not be an option of its own; one of the three options should be the
default.

> Besides, could you explain why are you trying to hijack a short and
> simple thread about globalising one or two USE flags?

I'm not trying to hijack this thread. I'm just injecting one message pointing
this out as something I think could benefit from my proposal.

A few real examples may go a long way to explaining something.

Marijn

- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHKzDup/VmCx0OL2wRAo5vAJ0VLX8BSFLFTY2K1wLADtS35jZHnwCfS8Vd
IgDXBRNrzWbiLfuZadHIzj8=
=MHt+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to