On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 21:43 +0000, Peter Weller wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 12:53 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 17:30 Sat 17 Nov , Peter Weller (welp) wrote: > > > 1.1 app-editors/tea/tea-17.4.1.ebuild > > > > > > file : > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-editors/tea/tea-17.4.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > > > plain: > > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-editors/tea/tea-17.4.1.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > > > > > src_compile() { > > > local myconf > > > > > > if use hacking; then > > > myconf="${myconf} --enable-hacking" > > > fi > > > if ! use gnome; then > > > myconf="${myconf} --enable-legacy" > > > fi > > > if use enchant; then > > > myconf="${myconf} --enable-enchant" > > > fi > > > > > > econf \ > > > $(use_enable ipv6) \ > > > ${myconf} || die "econf failed!" > > > > Any reason the rest of the flags aren't using use_enable()? > > > > Thanks, > > Donnie > > Yes. At least there used to be. I should check to see what the status is > at the moment. The configure script doesn't(/didn't) know about > --disable option(s) for at least some of the configuration flags, and > runtime problems were experienced in some cases. This may or may not be > fixed now, so I should check it out. > > welp
(To clarify: There was *something* wrong with use_enable(), I just can't remember exactly *what* the problem was. Will look into it tomorrow morning GMT.)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
