Rémi Cardona wrote: > Alec Warner wrote: >> On 11/27/07, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> How the recent changes happened to allow USE flag descriptions in >>> metadata.xml (which I'm not taking any position on now) gave me an idea. >>> The Linux kernel requires that any needed documentation accompany all >>> changes requiring said documentation -- part of the source-code patch >>> must apply to the Documentation/ directory. Should we require that >>> before you commit any changes, you (or someone) write the documentation >>> for them and commit it or submit a patch at the same time? >>> >>> To sum up: No undocumented changes. >> No, because this is not a realistic requirement, it's an ideal case. >> People will just commit changes without documentation anyway. > > What if Donnie had used s/changes/new features/ ? Then his proposal > makes much more sense.
I agree that new features makes more sense here. USE flag description in metadata.xml is just an example of new feature, IMO. My 2 HK$, ;) -- Zhang Le, Robert GPG key ID: 1E4E2973 Fingerprint: 0260 C902 B8F8 6506 6586 2B90 BC51 C808 1E4E 2973 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
