On 01:56 Fri 07 Dec , Jeffrey Gardner wrote: > While we're at it, why not bring those desktop files that are under our > control more inline with the freedesktop standards? > > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html > > Speaking for myself, "Edutainment" is a ridiculous category for science > programs and I intend to change the desktop files (for as many sci > programs as I can) to something more acceptable, as well as send patches > upstream. > I'm thinking Science-->Chemistry;Biology;Physics;etc... > > (although that doesn't quite fit the freedesktop standards either...)
Where are you quoting "Edutainment" from? I can't find it anywhere on that page. If you want to do something that doesn't fit the spec, get the spec fixed. Looking through that list of main categories, scientific packages might sorta fit in Education (to teach), Development (libraries and development tools), Graphics (sci-viz, molecular graphics, etc) or Office (to get work done), depending on each package's purpose. The additional categories seem to fit quite well. Thanks, Donnie -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
