Steve Long wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> There is no duplication of information, nor redundancy.
>>
> So what were the QA checks you mentioned to confirm that the same EAPI is
> set in both the filename and the ebuild, for-- if not integrity of
> duplicated data?
+1
>> Really. It's a heck of a lot cleaner in the filename suffix.
>>
> Nah, it's an awful hack and you know it. It has nothing to do with package
> naming and is unnecessary exposure of internal data.
Yes! Thank you, Steve!
-Joe
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
